ok ....now i am confused. this is the next tank and my numbers are off the chart. I’m reading 58.9 mpg on the gauge minus 4 = 54.9 if it holds...I thought heat was the enemy
. this whole tank the temp has been above 80 degrees. i know..... who does that but.... no air with windows up. if heat is the gold factor we could put an element in the air intake to heat it up for the winter and cut the fuel consumption. have not tried any high-speed runs as I’m hooked on get the max fuel numbers. I thought it would be 52.6. that alone would have made me happy. but 53.7 backed up with 53 and this tank... i will find out this week end if i beat 53.7. anybody got any ideas on why this heat would make this difference??????
Not bad Joe!!!!
Yes heat is great for MPG, especially shorter commutes.
There are several reasons
-The engine get's up to temp quicker which takes the car out of cold start enrichment sooner. This is a big help.
-The fluids start off much warmer which is less drag on the internals
-Warmer air is less dense, this means that the throttle must be opened more for the same "mass" of air to enter the engine and make XX power. The throttle being opened more for the same cruise speed cuts down on pumping losses which is good for MPG.
Typically you hear that warm air results in a leaner mixture which is why the mpg goes up. This is untrue because 1. In closed loop mode the ECM targets a 14.7 fuel mixture, it automatically changes the fuel mixture to hit this target. 2. It requires XX power to maintain a certain speed/accelerate X fast, a leaner mixture would result in a slower speed which is not the case. Instead the throttle plate is opened more to achieve the same air mass as colder temps. (air ingested is proportional to power produced)