ChrisJ
Active member
Leap day purchase and already 12,700 miles. I fully intend to replace the belt around 60-75K unless the service interval is lower. With teh exception of my 96 K1500 I dont think I have let a chain in any of my cars go more than 100K. The 4.3 in the truck needs some help and will probably get a decent overhaul next year. Its only at 140k, but it has had a very hard life. Before it was mine it had at least 2 15K oil changes. Its amazing how heavy an oil filter can get after that many miles. BTW the same basic engine can now go 10k on an oil change. I find that hard to believe. My suspicion is that "owner maintenance cost" is more of a factor than the oil and engine really being that good. At least around me, most people seem to lease rather than buy and a lot of those that buy only keep a car for 3-5 years tops. Its a sales gimmick as far as I am concerned.
This is just my personal opinion, and I realize that it is not the same as everyone else.
I also agree with changing belts at 100K but NOT chains. I had a 305 SBC with a chain that lasted to 196K when I junked the car and the engine ran great. Later on I drove a 92 C-2500 with a 350 and 5spd which I traded in with 226K on it and the original chain. I'm sure the chains end up with some slop in them at 200K, but I was more curious about how much wear the cams in them had being the lifters were not roller lifters.