Checked mine in my 1.4 today and they were all ay .026. Should I re-gap? If so, to what?
That is where my 1.4 manual trans - non tuned Sonics' plugs were gapped. Prior to checking and adjusting the gap, I noticed that on a cold start, the engine would shudder or wobble some during startup. It just didn't start crisply; like a hesitation and wobble before coming to idle. After adjusting the gap to a non-recomended gap of .030; an increase of just .004 from where they were; I truly feel that the engines' cold starting has improved, and I perceive a little more pull in the lower gears upon acceleration. Now I realize that I wanted to notice a difference, and some may say it's a placebo effect; but I'm pleased with the results; placebo effect or not.
I noticed that on the Chevy Cruze forum; many owners were adjusting their plug gaps to .035 and were experiencing better performance; again, maybe just perceived gains. I would at least set them to the current spec, and experiment some if you feel the need.
Papasonic
I just checked mine tonight and had readings of #1: .021, #3-4: .026. i gaped them all to factory .028 specs, but after reading more i guess i might pull them back out and bump up to .030 or something in that ball park. It wouldn't take long to do it again after i just did it once and figured it all out first time. I took pics and plan on posting a few if nobody has done a how to page yet. Also a few of my plugs had a small amount of carbon and smelled like gas as well as looked wet. The car has not been started in 3 days so maybe a bigger gap will help burn the fuel better.
Has any general concensus been reached regarding the appropriate gap on the 1.4 turbos? Should we go with .028 factory or .030?
What about 1.8s
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
Officially 0.028", but on cruzetalk they've had success up to 0.035"
Really? What kind of success? Better MPG, power, etc.?
Has anyone actually done before and after dynos on a car with .028 plugs vs .030 or greater?
From what I gathered on the Cruzetalk discussion, it's all butt dyno reports. I'm not saying that there isn't a potential benefit, but no one has provided any truly scientific data and documentation.
One concern I have about increasing the plug gap beyond specs is this: Is the ignition coilpack capable of the increased secondary output voltage demand? And if so, for how long? The wider the gap, and the more combustion pressure within the cylinder; (engines with a tune), demands higher coil output. This must be what some are referring to as blowout; experiencing a misfire with too much gap.
I have already experienced a coilpack failure with my 1.4 with a stock tune. I'm just wondering if the reason the factory plug gap seems to have a tighter than customary specification is that the ignition coilpack may be just marginal for its application. (Adequate, but nothing more)
---------
Papasonic